arbiter
JournalsAccount

The Relationship Between ESG and Corruption Events in the Banking Industry: An Empirical Analysis

Pablo de Andrés et al.

Business Research Quarterly2026https://doi.org/10.1177/23409444261416937article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

We analyse the relationship between Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) practices and the probability of being involved in corruption in banking. We draw on two opposing theoretical frameworks (i.e., the stakeholder view and the impression management view), to assess whether ESG-oriented banks are genuinely concerned about anti-corruption practices or potentially involved in deceptive strategies. Using a sample of 46 Eurozone banks over the 2013–2022, our results suggest the existence of a beneficial negative association between ESG and corruption supporting the stakeholder theory. We show that such result is mainly driven by the G pillar, highlighting the key role in corporate governance in preventing corruption events. Moreover, we find that bank-level characteristics, corporate governance mechanisms, and country-level institutional factors play a key role in shaping such relationship. Our findings have important policy and managerial implications in terms of prevention of corruption scandals that can jeopardise the effectiveness of bank financial intermediation. Jel classification: G21, G28, K20

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/23409444261416937

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{pablo2026,
  title        = {{The Relationship Between ESG and Corruption Events in the Banking Industry: An Empirical Analysis}},
  author       = {Pablo de Andrés et al.},
  journal      = {Business Research Quarterly},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/23409444261416937},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Relationship Between ESG and Corruption Events in the Banking Industry: An Empirical Analysis

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.