arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Under the Hood: Detroit Three Bargaining and Intra-Union Tensions in Canada

Larry Savage & Paul Christopher Gray

Labor Studies Journal2025https://doi.org/10.1177/0160449x251315770article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

Despite achieving substantial contract gains, including significant wage increases, the 2023 pattern agreement reached between Unifor—Canada’s largest private sector union—and Detroit Three automakers was met with mixed reactions from union members, with particularly low support from skilled trades and more senior members. This study reveals how intra-union dynamics were shaped by shifting socioeconomic conditions, comparisons with the United Auto Workers, differences between production and skilled trades members, generational tensions, and leadership conflicts intertwined with strike dynamics. These factors influenced bargaining expectations and union strategy. The findings suggest that intra-union tensions weakened member solidarity and support for the historically strong pattern agreement, highlighting the complex interplay between external pressures and internal union dynamics in collective bargaining.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0160449x251315770

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{larry2025,
  title        = {{Under the Hood: Detroit Three Bargaining and Intra-Union Tensions in Canada}},
  author       = {Larry Savage & Paul Christopher Gray},
  journal      = {Labor Studies Journal},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0160449x251315770},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Under the Hood: Detroit Three Bargaining and Intra-Union Tensions in Canada

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.