The Influence of Exposure and Error Type on Estimates of Automation Reliability

Colleen E. Patton et al.

Human Factors2026https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208261435308article
AJG 3
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

ObjectiveWe evaluated the sensitivity and calibration of users when estimating the reliability of an automated decision support system as exposure to the system and the saliency of errors varied.BackgroundAlthough users are typically sensitive when estimating the reliability of an automated system, it is not known how exposure to a system or error saliency influences the estimate. Viewpoints of the "leaky integrator" and "intuitive statistician" suggest competing outcomes regarding estimates over time.MethodsParticipants identified matching images of MegaBlocks with assistance from an automated system. Participants experienced three levels of reliability and three levels of exposure (number of trials). They provided estimates of reliability, trust, and confidence in their estimates for each system. In Experiment 2, the saliency of false alarms and misses was manipulated. In Experiment 3, the saliency of these error types was matched.ResultsReliability estimates were sensitive to true reliability but were lower with more salient errors. Exposure had no impact on the estimates of reliability or trust. Trust and confidence in the estimate of reliability increased with true reliability.ConclusionsEstimates of reliability are generally sensitive to the true reliability of a system, although they can be hindered by memory limitations and/or saliency effects. Estimates of reliability are made very quickly and do not tend to change with exposure.ApplicationsTraining users on a new system may not require extensive exposure, but early interactions with a system should accurately represent the amount and types of errors that the system will make.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208261435308

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{colleen2026,
  title        = {{The Influence of Exposure and Error Type on Estimates of Automation Reliability}},
  author       = {Colleen E. Patton et al.},
  journal      = {Human Factors},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208261435308},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Influence of Exposure and Error Type on Estimates of Automation Reliability

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.