Making digital welfare work: conceptualizing digital compensatory work by frontline professionals

Julia Sofia Carlsson et al.

Journal of Professions and Organization2026https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joag011article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Digital technologies in welfare organizations frequently generate gaps, ambiguities, and misalignments that require professional intervention. Yet prior research has tended to portray frontline workers mainly as resistant or adaptive actors, leaving under-examined their active contributions to sustaining broader digital infrastructures. This article introduces the concept of digital compensatory work to capture how professionals intervene when specific digital technologies fall short of their own standards for professional service delivery. Drawing on an exploratory literature review, we identify three forms of such compensatory work: complementing digital technologies, rectifying their shortcomings, and dismissing them when they conflict with professional judgment. By theorizing these practices, the article expands existing understandings of professional discretion in digital welfare services, shifting attention from resistance and adaptation to value-driven interventions that actively uphold service quality within digital infrastructures. In doing so, it contributes to debates on digital welfare and highlights the essential role of professional agency in sustaining human service organizations under conditions of digital transformation.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joag011

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{julia2026,
  title        = {{Making digital welfare work: conceptualizing digital compensatory work by frontline professionals}},
  author       = {Julia Sofia Carlsson et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Professions and Organization},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joag011},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Making digital welfare work: conceptualizing digital compensatory work by frontline professionals

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.