Adolescent Self-Control and Career Ambivalence: Longitudinal Mediation via Decision-Making Self-Efficacy

Yu-Zhe He et al.

Journal of Career Development2026https://doi.org/10.1177/08948453261416057article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This longitudinal study examined how self-control influences adolescents’ ambivalence in career decision-making through the development of career decision-making self-efficacy (CDSE). Participants were 609 Chinese adolescents (ages 8–15, 43.30% females). Guided by the Social Cognitive Career Theory and the Career Self-Management model, we proposed that self-control functions as a regulatory foundation shaping both the initial level and change of career ambivalence via efficacy beliefs. Data were collected across three waves and analyzed using latent growth modeling. Results indicated that higher self-control predicted a slower increase in career ambivalence over time, partly through stronger early self-efficacy. During adolescence, CDSE declined while ambivalence increased, reflecting divergent motivational and emotional trends. These findings highlight the interplay between self-regulation and motivation in adolescent career development and suggest that fostering both self-control and self-efficacy can promote confident and adaptive career decision-making.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/08948453261416057

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{yu-zhe2026,
  title        = {{Adolescent Self-Control and Career Ambivalence: Longitudinal Mediation via Decision-Making Self-Efficacy}},
  author       = {Yu-Zhe He et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Career Development},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/08948453261416057},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Adolescent Self-Control and Career Ambivalence: Longitudinal Mediation via Decision-Making Self-Efficacy

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.