arbiter
JournalsAccount

Government Venture Capital and Entrepreneurship: Evidence From China

Isabelle Zhang

Journal of Empirical Legal Studies2025https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.70011article
ABDC A*
Weight
0.37

Abstract

Government venture capital funds (GVCs) are a global phenomenon. GVCs are central players in China's VC market, now the second largest globally. While existing literature often depicts China's GVCs as a successful public effort to promote entrepreneurship, this paper presents an alternative view. It explores the effect of city‐level GVC programs on entrepreneurship, as proxied by the formation of new businesses. Using a hand‐collected 20‐year dataset covering GVC program adoption, early‐stage investments, and new firm formation in 280 prefectural cities and employing difference‐in‐differences and weighted stacked event study methods, I find that Chinese GVCs are associated with a decrease in overall new firm formation. Interview‐based evidence and a triple‐differences analysis by industrial sector suggest that this result is driven by stringent investment restrictions imposed by GVC programs, which absorb private sector capital into GVC funds targeting specific industries, thereby discouraging new firm formation in non‐policy‐supported sectors. These findings offer a cautionary note to global policymakers regarding the complexities of public finance strategies aimed at boosting entrepreneurship.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.70011

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{isabelle2025,
  title        = {{Government Venture Capital and Entrepreneurship: Evidence From China}},
  author       = {Isabelle Zhang},
  journal      = {Journal of Empirical Legal Studies},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.70011},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Government Venture Capital and Entrepreneurship: Evidence From China

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.