The Price of Progress: Modernisation and Traditional Crafts and Cities in China

Yangwen Zheng

Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient2026https://doi.org/10.1163/15685209-12341667article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Abstract More than a century of modernisation—163 years if we count from 1862 when the Tongzhi Restoration was launched—has injected new blood into the old Chinese civilisation and brought China into the orbit of a modern world. But at what cost? Scholars of China have researched and debated about modernisation from various perspectives. But few have asked: what has China lost in its quest for and in achieving modernity? This article takes a concrete look at the damage done by industrialisation and urbanisation, offering a glimpse into what has been lost. It argues that these processes have devastated traditional crafts and household/village industries, ruined traditional cities, and wrecked the urban landscape/environment. They have led to overconsumption that has and will continue to devastate the country. Conceptualising the cost of modernisation opens a unique window to interrogate the transformation of the Middle Kingdom. It exposes the problem with modernisation in China.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/15685209-12341667

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{yangwen2026,
  title        = {{The Price of Progress: Modernisation and Traditional Crafts and Cities in China}},
  author       = {Yangwen Zheng},
  journal      = {Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/15685209-12341667},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Price of Progress: Modernisation and Traditional Crafts and Cities in China

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.