arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Detecting expertise in decision making under pressure: a virtual reality assessment environment and empirical evaluation

Matthew B. Thompson et al.

Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications2026https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-025-00695-6article
AJG 2
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Professions such as military, aviation, submarine operation, and emergency response require individuals to navigate complex environments characterized by limited information, stringent time constraints, and significant pressures. Effective decision making under pressure is crucial in safety-critical professions, yet measuring this expertise remains challenging. Inspired by the military context, this article introduces the virtual reality decision-making expertise (VR-DMX) environment, designed to evaluate decision-making expertise under time constraints within a virtual reality scenario. VR-DMX simulates an amusement arcade where users must decide how to allocate time across various games to maximize ticket earnings. Through two validation studies (N = 60 and N = 76), we examined two metrics: Total Tickets (measuring overall performance) and DMX score (isolating decision-making quality). Both metrics demonstrated symmetrical distributions without floor or ceiling effects, with coefficients of variation comparable to established individual difference measures (32.4-37.4% for Total Tickets; 20.8-27.6% for DMX score). The moderate correlation between metrics (meta-analysis r = 0.771, 95% CI [0.599, 0.943]) indicates they measure related but distinct constructs. Our findings indicate that VR-DMX effectively differentiates individual performance levels and captures a distinct decision-making component that is separate from general cognitive abilities. Comparing decision-making expertise between professionals in safety-critical fields with those without such experience would be a sensible next step to help validate the potential for selection and training applications. VR-DMX was designed to measure decision-making expertise in safety-critical contexts, and initial validation data demonstrating effective differentiation of individual performance levels suggest that continued development could fulfill this design intention for applications in selection, training, and performance prediction.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-025-00695-6

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{matthew2026,
  title        = {{Detecting expertise in decision making under pressure: a virtual reality assessment environment and empirical evaluation}},
  author       = {Matthew B. Thompson et al.},
  journal      = {Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-025-00695-6},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Detecting expertise in decision making under pressure: a virtual reality assessment environment and empirical evaluation

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.