Household Perspectives on Urban Water Service Delivery: Implications for Policy and Practice in the Philippines

Emmanuel M. Preña et al.

Public Works Management and Policy2026https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724x261439281article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Achieving safe and reliable water services remains a critical challenge in many rapidly urbanizing cities and is central to Sustainable Development Goal 6. In the Philippines, service delivery is constrained by aging infrastructure, fragmented governance, and weak accountability, slowing progress toward universal access. This study examines household perspectives on water services in Legazpi City, one of the fastest-urbanizing cities in the country, drawing on a large-scale household survey. Using Importance–Performance Analysis and thematic coding, it evaluates five service dimensions: water quality, supply reliability, staff performance, customer support, and billing. Results show consistent strengths in staff courtesy and billing accuracy but reveal persistent concerns about water quality and supply reliability, which households view as essential to daily well-being. Thematic evidence highlights discolored water, weak pressure, frequent interruptions, and poor communication. These findings emphasize the need for infrastructure investment, stronger transparency, and institutionalized user feedback to improve service governance.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724x261439281

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{emmanuel2026,
  title        = {{Household Perspectives on Urban Water Service Delivery: Implications for Policy and Practice in the Philippines}},
  author       = {Emmanuel M. Preña et al.},
  journal      = {Public Works Management and Policy},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724x261439281},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Household Perspectives on Urban Water Service Delivery: Implications for Policy and Practice in the Philippines

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.