Identification and estimation of continuous‐time dynamic discrete choice games

Jason R. Blevins

Quantitative Economics2026https://doi.org/10.3982/qe2281article
AJG 4ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This paper considers the theoretical, computational, and econometric properties of continuous‐time dynamic discrete choice games with stochastically sequential moves, introduced by Arcidiacono, Bayer, Blevins, and Ellickson (2016). We consider identification of the rate of move arrivals, which was assumed to be known in previous work, as well as a generalized version with heterogeneous move arrival rates. We reestablish conditions for existence of a Markov perfect equilibrium in the generalized model and consider identification of the model primitives with only discrete‐time data sampled at fixed intervals. Three foundational example models are considered: a single agent renewal model, a dynamic entry and exit model, and a quality ladder model. Through these examples we examine the computational and statistical properties of estimators via Monte Carlo experiments and an empirical example using data from Rust (1987). The experiments show how parameter estimates behave when moving from continuous‐time data to discrete‐time data of decreasing frequency and the computational feasibility as the number of firms grows. The empirical example highlights the impact of allowing decision rates to vary.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3982/qe2281

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jason2026,
  title        = {{Identification and estimation of continuous‐time dynamic discrete choice games}},
  author       = {Jason R. Blevins},
  journal      = {Quantitative Economics},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3982/qe2281},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Identification and estimation of continuous‐time dynamic discrete choice games

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.