arbiter
JournalsAccount

Disentangling managerialization and professionalization in family SMEs: Distinct drivers and asymmetric mediation

Chiara Morelli et al.

Journal of Small Business Management2026https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2026.2632373article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This study disentangles the intertwined processes of managerialization, conceptualized as the adoption of management control systems (MCSs) and human resource management systems (HRMSs), and professionalization, operationalized through the presence of managerial roles, in family firms, offering an integrated theoretical and empirical framework. Drawing on a sample of 427 Italian family SMEs, we find that firm size, strategic complexity, and family governance structures distinctly drive the adoption of MCSs and HRMSs. Professionalization emerges as a critical mediating mechanism for MCSs, but not for HRMSs, revealing asymmetric formalization logics. By integrating socio-technical systems and contingency theories, we complement linear formalization models by emphasizing family firms’ hybrid, context-dependent configurations. Our findings inform both theoretical debates and managerial practices.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2026.2632373

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{chiara2026,
  title        = {{Disentangling managerialization and professionalization in family SMEs: Distinct drivers and asymmetric mediation}},
  author       = {Chiara Morelli et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Small Business Management},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2026.2632373},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Disentangling managerialization and professionalization in family SMEs: Distinct drivers and asymmetric mediation

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.