arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

9. Making decisions

Janice Gross Stein

Foreign Policy (Washington)2024https://doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780192863072.003.0009book-chapter
ABDC C
Weight
0.30

What the paper says

This chapter looks at the contribution that rational models of choice can make to foreign policy analysis. It then examines cognitive models that identify the boundaries to rationality in decision making. The chapter then looks at new research in neuroscience that recasts the role of rational models and highlights the importance of emotions. It concludes with suggestions for system design that can improve foreign policy decision making.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780192863072.003.0009

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{janice2024,
  title        = {{9. Making decisions}},
  author       = {Janice Gross Stein},
  journal      = {Foreign Policy (Washington)},
  year         = {2024},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780192863072.003.0009},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

9. Making decisions

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.30

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.