arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Corrigendum: Sustainable modeling in reverse logistics strategies using fuzzy MCDM: case of China Pakistan Economic Corridor

Unknown author

Management of Environmental Quality2026https://doi.org/10.1108/meq-01-2026-0072article
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

It has come to the attention of the publisher that the article Asees Awan M, Ali Y (2019), “Sustainable modeling in reverse logistics strategies using fuzzy MCDM: Case of China Pakistan Economic Corridor”. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, Vol. 30 No. 5 pp. 1132-1151, https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-01-2019-0024, has incorrectly quoted data from another source. The authors outline on page 12 “According to Panwhar and Fiedler (2018), the annual solid waste production of Pakistan is 48m tons …”. The correct quotation is: “According to Panwhar and Fiedler (2018), the annual solid waste production of Pakistan is 20m tons …”. The authors sincerely apologise for this and the error has now been corrected in the online version.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/meq-01-2026-0072

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{unknown2026,
  title        = {{Corrigendum: Sustainable modeling in reverse logistics strategies using fuzzy MCDM: case of China Pakistan Economic Corridor}},
  author       = {Unknown author},
  journal      = {Management of Environmental Quality},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/meq-01-2026-0072},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Corrigendum: Sustainable modeling in reverse logistics strategies using fuzzy MCDM: case of China Pakistan Economic Corridor

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.