arbiter
JournalsAccount

Do pictures speak differently than labels? Implications for visual communication in animal welfare labelling using insights of a consumer study in Germany

Sarah Kühl et al.

Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics2026https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2026.102552article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

• The four animal welfare label levels were selected in equal shares. • Adding pictures of husbandry systems increased the choice of higher levels. • Content of pictures influence how the choice is influenced. • Respondents prefer husbandry systems with straw bedding. In response to growing consumer interest in meat produced using more species-appropriate husbandry methods, food retailers in Germany have introduced a multi-level animal welfare label. This allows existing animal welfare certifications to be categorised into one of four levels. However, the market share of the higher levels has so far been rather low, possibly due to the poor comprehensibility and credibility of many animal welfare labels. Initial studies show that consumers want more information about animal welfare labels, preferably as pictures. Nevertheless, no studies have yet investigated whether pictures representing the respective farming systems influence purchasing decisions, or how different photos affect the choice of the same label level. Our survey of 1,079 German meat consumers revealed that some respondents changed their hypothetical purchase decision for pork when shown pictures of husbandry systems, predominantly in favour of higher-welfare farming systems (20%–26%). To test the effect of different pictures, respondents were randomised into one of four experimental groups in which the pictures for label levels 3 and 4 differed (between-subjects split-sampling design). Our results show that the selection of photos depicting various types of housing significantly influenced the respondents’ decisions. The most positive effect was achieved by pictures displaying pigs standing on straw (level 3), whereas pictures showing outdoor access had a less positive influence (level 4). This study is the first to demonstrate, utilising an experimental approach, the opportunities and challenges of using pictures for animal welfare communication, providing valuable contributions to the debate on improving label content.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2026.102552

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{sarah2026,
  title        = {{Do pictures speak differently than labels? Implications for visual communication in animal welfare labelling using insights of a consumer study in Germany}},
  author       = {Sarah Kühl et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2026.102552},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Do pictures speak differently than labels? Implications for visual communication in animal welfare labelling using insights of a consumer study in Germany

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.