Shared Misconceptions in Theories of “Chinese Imperialism” and “Brazilian Subimperialism” in Latin America

Tiago Soares Nogara & Jiang Shixue

Science & Society2025https://doi.org/10.1177/00368237251334300article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.44

What the paper says

In the early twenty-first century, China’s economic and political presence in Latin America grew significantly, particularly after its accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO), while Brazil took on an active leadership role in promoting regional integration, especially during the Workers’ Party (PT) administrations. This period saw a surge in analyses labeling China’s engagement in Latin America as “imperialist” and Brazil’s as “subimperialist.” By critically examining the key foreign policy instruments employed by both nations in the Latin American context, this article challenges these characterizations, arguing instead that Brazil and China’s actions have strengthened South–South cooperation and provided constructive alternatives for the international integration of the region’s countries.

3 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00368237251334300

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{tiago2025,
  title        = {{Shared Misconceptions in Theories of “Chinese Imperialism” and “Brazilian Subimperialism” in Latin America}},
  author       = {Tiago Soares Nogara & Jiang Shixue},
  journal      = {Science & Society},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00368237251334300},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Shared Misconceptions in Theories of “Chinese Imperialism” and “Brazilian Subimperialism” in Latin America

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.44

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.32 × 0.4 = 0.13
M · momentum0.57 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.