arbiter
JournalsAccount

Toward a theory of sustainable resource integration

Rolf Findsrud et al.

AMS Review2025https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-025-00315-yarticle
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.41

Abstract

The concept of sustainability has fostered increased interest among service researchers, particularly in relation to making service ecosystems more sustainable. While this growing body of work has examined relevant drivers and barriers and explored strategies for facilitating such transitions, the concept of sustainable resource integration remains underdeveloped. With no clear definition to guide research and practice, the need for theorizing resource integration from a sustainability perspective is key. To address this gap, the present study employed a theory adaptation approach, drawing on service-dominant logic (domain theory) and sustainability and circular economy (method theories) to define sustainable resource integration as using resources in ways that are materially supportable, performatively viable, and temporally adaptive, such that the activities can be continued without undermining the systemic conditions it depends upon. In addition to a definition, the paper provides three propositions as a foundation for theorizing sustainable resource integration and its role in the evolution of service ecosystems.

2 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-025-00315-y

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{rolf2025,
  title        = {{Toward a theory of sustainable resource integration}},
  author       = {Rolf Findsrud et al.},
  journal      = {AMS Review},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-025-00315-y},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Toward a theory of sustainable resource integration

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.