arbiter
JournalsAccount

The Role of Attentional Control in Deception While Under Cognitive Load

Evan Brennan & Keith A. Hutchison

Applied Cognitive Psychology2026https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.70197article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

We examined the association between attentional control and the ability to lie. After being tested for individual differences in attentional control, pairs of participants answered autobiographical questions truthfully and dishonestly while under high and low cognitive load, with one participant answering questions and the other participant detecting their answers for veracity. Lying ability was assessed by participants' reaction times and their ability to evade detection. We hypothesized that RTs would be associated with detection accuracy, that low relative to high attentional control would be associated with longer lie RTs, and that high attentional control would be associated with a better ability to evade detection when lying under high cognitive load. Results demonstrated that RTs were indeed associated with detection accuracy and that attentional control is associated with RTs when lying, but not with deception detection. Cognitive load was not associated with any of the variables. We discuss many future research directions.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.70197

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{evan2026,
  title        = {{The Role of Attentional Control in Deception While Under Cognitive Load}},
  author       = {Evan Brennan & Keith A. Hutchison},
  journal      = {Applied Cognitive Psychology},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.70197},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Role of Attentional Control in Deception While Under Cognitive Load

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.