arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

The effect of conditional incentives in an email–web valuation survey of recreational anglers

David W. Carter et al.

Q Open: A Journal of Agricultural, Climate, Environmental, Food, Resource, and Rural Development Economics2025https://doi.org/10.1093/qopen/qoae033article
ABDC C
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

Abstract Web surveys often suffer from low response rates when invitations are sent via email. We conducted an experiment testing the effects of a $5 Starbucks gift card incentive on response rates and survey results from an email–web survey of Gulf of Mexico recreational anglers. Half the sample was randomly assigned to be offered the incentive for completion of the survey. Despite this, response rates were nearly identical between the incentivized (12 percent) and non-incentivized (13 percent) groups. Respondent demographics, fishing trip characteristics, and econometric estimates were highly consistent across groups. Statistical tests could not reject the null of no difference between the incentive treatments. Our results suggest foregoing small conditional non-monetary incentives can be cost-effective for this type of specialized recreation survey using an email protocol. However, generalizability to other populations, incentives, and protocols requires further research. The non-monetary incentive did not meaningfully impact response rates or estimates in this context.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/qopen/qoae033

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{david2025,
  title        = {{The effect of conditional incentives in an email–web valuation survey of recreational anglers}},
  author       = {David W. Carter et al.},
  journal      = {Q Open: A Journal of Agricultural, Climate, Environmental, Food, Resource, and Rural Development Economics},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/qopen/qoae033},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The effect of conditional incentives in an email–web valuation survey of recreational anglers

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.