Managing Predator–Prey Fisheries With Prey Refuges

Guillaume Bataille

Journal of Public Economic Theory2026https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.70098article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Many natural and artificial marine habitats provide refuge for prey species by reducing predation pressure. While such refuges are primarily intended to support biodiversity, their economic implications remain insufficiently understood. This paper develops a tractable two‐species predator–prey model with specialized, strategic harvesting to assess how prey refuges shape the efficiency and sustainability of multispecies fisheries. Prey refuges lower effective fishing pressure on both species. Beyond increasing gains in the prey fishery by mitigating natural predation, they may also generate spillover gains for the predator industry through greater prey availability outside the refuge. The analysis characterizes conditions under which a welfare‐maximizing regulator would implement an artificial refuge to manage predation intensity. Since a refuge provides benefits only through population dynamics, the discount rate is an important determinant of the model. Even when human predation is controlled through optimal harvesting quotas, artificial refuges remain an effective instrument for managing natural predation. Finally, I use data from predator–prey interactions in Lake Victoria fisheries to support the theoretical findings.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.70098

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{guillaume2026,
  title        = {{Managing Predator–Prey Fisheries With Prey Refuges}},
  author       = {Guillaume Bataille},
  journal      = {Journal of Public Economic Theory},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.70098},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Managing Predator–Prey Fisheries With Prey Refuges

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.