Governing Digital Transformation: When States Centralize and Localities Innovate (Virginia and Florida, 2000–2025)
Minzi Su
What the paper says
This comparative study of Virginia and Florida (2000–2025) examines how contrasting state governance structures shape local digital transformation. Findings from Digital Counties and Digital States Survey rankings, practitioner interviews, and policy analysis show that Virginia’s centralized Dillon’s Rule framework, supported by sustained state funding, produced equitable digital capacity across urban and rural counties. Florida’s traditionally decentralized Home Rule approach fostered urban innovation but constrained rural diffusion—a limitation its new broadband trust fund now addresses. Integrating multi-level governance and policy feedback perspectives, the study proposes a sequenced hybrid heuristic: states first mandate affordability and build foundational infrastructure to close persistent rural employment and tradable-sector gaps, then empower local collaborative networks to drive inclusive innovation and economic revitalization. This framework transcends the centralization–decentralization dichotomy and offers federated systems a replicable pathway from infrastructure deployment to equitable rural prosperity.
Evidence weight
Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
| F · citation impact | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
| M · momentum | 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 |
| V · venue signal | 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 |
| R · text relevance † | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.