arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Cross‐Border E‐Commerce and the Reduction of Import Trade Costs: Evidence From Linguistic Dimensions

Ye Chen & Xueyao Guo

Asian-Pacific Economic Literature2026https://doi.org/10.1111/apel.70041article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

ABSTRACT This paper investigates the causal impact of Cross‐Border E‐commerce (CBEC) on China's import trade costs, focusing on the mitigation of non‐geographic barriers. We first quantify China's bilateral trade costs using a structural trade‐cost measurement framework. To establish causality, we employ a Difference‐in‐Differences (DID) model with a novel, industry‐level identification strategy based on the official ‘CBEC Retail Import Commodity List’. Results show that the CBEC policy significantly lowers overall import trade costs. Furthermore, by constructing a detailed Linguistic Barrier Index, we find that the negative impact of linguistic barriers substantially diminishes under the CBEC model, enabling freer trade despite language differences. We also note the persistent role of English as a trade lingua franca. These findings offer a novel identification strategy and hold important implications for CBEC enterprises seeking strategic localisation in multilingual markets. JEL Classification: F14, Z13

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/apel.70041

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{ye2026,
  title        = {{Cross‐Border E‐Commerce and the Reduction of Import Trade Costs: Evidence From Linguistic Dimensions}},
  author       = {Ye Chen & Xueyao Guo},
  journal      = {Asian-Pacific Economic Literature},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/apel.70041},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Cross‐Border E‐Commerce and the Reduction of Import Trade Costs: Evidence From Linguistic Dimensions

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.