arbiter
JournalsAccount

The Dispute Threshold: How the Public Policy Rationale Fails to Guide the Application of Federal Rule of Evidence 408

Y. Steve

Cornell Law Review2013article
ABDC A*
Weight
0.26

Abstract

No abstract available.

Cite this paper

@article{y.2013,
  title        = {{The Dispute Threshold: How the Public Policy Rationale Fails to Guide the Application of Federal Rule of Evidence 408}},
  author       = {Y. Steve},
  journal      = {Cornell Law Review},
  year         = {2013},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Dispute Threshold: How the Public Policy Rationale Fails to Guide the Application of Federal Rule of Evidence 408

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.26

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.20 × 0.15 = 0.03
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.