arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Noisy Screening Models for the Educational Cramp in Korea

Joonmo Cho

Journal of International Economic Studies1994https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-006-0100-4article
ABDC C
Weight
0.26

What the paper says

We have developed an office-based dot-EIA for the detection of a urinary high molecular weight cytokeratin (CK). Immunohistochemical staining and western blot based on CK1K10 monoclonal antibody were used to identify the CK. Urine of 192 patients with different types, grades, and stages of bladder tumor and 72 controls were evaluated using dot-EIA. An intense and diffuse cytoplasmic reaction was shown in bladder squamous cell carcinoma. The target epitope was identified in urine at 65, 56, and 40-kDa. The CK purified from urine showed single polypeptide at 65-kDa using SDS-PAGE and single peak at 7.4 min using capillary zone electrophoresis. The dot-EIA detected the CK with high sensitivity (97%) and specificity (94%). The CK was not detected in urine of bladder cancer patients showing response to radiotherapy. The sensitive and specific office-based detection of urinary cytokeratin would be helpful in rapid diagnosis and follow up of bladder carcinoma.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-006-0100-4

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{joonmo1994,
  title        = {{Noisy Screening Models for the Educational Cramp in Korea}},
  author       = {Joonmo Cho},
  journal      = {Journal of International Economic Studies},
  year         = {1994},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-006-0100-4},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Noisy Screening Models for the Educational Cramp in Korea

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.26

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.20 × 0.15 = 0.03
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.