arbiter
JournalsAccount

Why are employees most susceptible to automation least likely to retrain? Automation risks and inequalities in learning intention, perceived opportunities, and learning participation among employee groups

Giedo Jansen et al.

Economic and Industrial Democracy: an international journal2025https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831x251331749article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.41

Abstract

The rise of intelligent technologies is believed to change job requirements, urging individuals to engage in work-related learning to stay employable. Studies on workers’ learning participation found that employees who are most at risk of automation are least likely to engage in work-related learning. To better understand this paradox, this study investigates to what extent differences in work-related learning for technological adaptation are explained by (a) workers’ actual automation risk, (b) their subjective perception of automation risks, (c) differences in their learning intention, and (d) access to lifelong development opportunities and supportive learning environments. Novel survey data on Dutch employees ( N = 1,719) are used. The results based on (generalized) structural equation modeling show that differences in learning between high- and low-risk workers can be explained by workers’ differences in their learning intentions and their (perceived) access to education and supportive learning environments, but not by their subjective perceptions of automation.

2 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831x251331749

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{giedo2025,
  title        = {{Why are employees most susceptible to automation least likely to retrain? Automation risks and inequalities in learning intention, perceived opportunities, and learning participation among employee groups}},
  author       = {Giedo Jansen et al.},
  journal      = {Economic and Industrial Democracy: an international journal},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831x251331749},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Why are employees most susceptible to automation least likely to retrain? Automation risks and inequalities in learning intention, perceived opportunities, and learning participation among employee groups

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.