Reassuring the Markets: The New Politics of Social Concertation in Acute Crisis Times

Arianna Tassinari

Politics and Society2025https://doi.org/10.1177/00323292241308684article
AJG 3ABDC B
Weight
0.48

What the paper says

Why do governments facing economic crises sometimes engage organized producer groups in policymaking through social concertation, and sometimes proceed unilaterally? I argue that governments’ choices to exclude or include unions and employers’ organizations from policymaking can be underpinned by a motivation overlooked by prior corporatist theory: reassuring the markets. Under conditions of financialized globalization, international economic actors—creditors, credit rating agencies, investors, and international institutions—acquire a novel role as audiences to which policymakers seek to send signals to abate intensity of exogenous economic pressures. The article puts forward a novel theoretical account to explain governments’ choice of signaling strategy—concertation or unilateralism—for the purpose of reassuring the markets. The argument is substantiated through a comparative analysis of policymaking in labor market, industrial relations, and pensions policy in Portugal, Italy, and Ireland during the Eurozone sovereign debt crisis (2010–14), drawing on seventy-three qualitative interviews and in-depth process tracing.

6 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00323292241308684

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{arianna2025,
  title        = {{Reassuring the Markets: The New Politics of Social Concertation in Acute Crisis Times}},
  author       = {Arianna Tassinari},
  journal      = {Politics and Society},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00323292241308684},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Reassuring the Markets: The New Politics of Social Concertation in Acute Crisis Times

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.48

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.44 × 0.4 = 0.18
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.