Exploring Gender, Work, and Family: Understanding Sport Management Alumni Not Working in Sport

Jaime R. DeLuca & Jessica R. Braunstein-Minkove

Sport Management Education Journal2026https://doi.org/10.1123/smej.2024-0037article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Institutions of higher education sponsor sport management and related programs to prepare students for professional careers in the expansive sport industry. However, the field is both complex and complicated, often characterized by a variety of inequities and long-standing structures that prove difficult to transcend. Therefore, the purpose of this work is to delve further into some of these issues through an investigation of one sport management program’s alumni who are no longer working in sport. Through this longitudinal study, findings demonstrate program alumni are relatively evenly split between those in the industry and those not. The top reasons for not and/or no longer working in the sports industry include lack of jobs/high competition for jobs, better opportunity outside of the industry, low pay, and family/personal reasons.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1123/smej.2024-0037

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jaime2026,
  title        = {{Exploring Gender, Work, and Family: Understanding Sport Management Alumni Not Working in Sport}},
  author       = {Jaime R. DeLuca & Jessica R. Braunstein-Minkove},
  journal      = {Sport Management Education Journal},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1123/smej.2024-0037},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Exploring Gender, Work, and Family: Understanding Sport Management Alumni Not Working in Sport

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.