Appreciating dissonance: Using open appreciative inquiry as a tool to generate cultural change

Charles Dorr et al.

Teaching Public Administration2025https://doi.org/10.1177/01447394251360762article
AJG 1
Weight
0.44

What the paper says

Appreciative inquiry has become increasingly popular as a method for facilitating organisational or systemic change through focusing on the positive aspects and ‘life giving properties of a system’ as opposed to traditional ‘deficit-based’ approaches. However, there has been criticism that this process could invalidate negative experiences of organisations and/or systems. This is particularly problematic if an existing system is seen by its users as providing little value or if there is potential dissonance regarding system value among key stakeholders. Using two case studies of open appreciative inquiry by Plymouth City Council staff, this article outlines how the use of a liberally defined, human-learning-system informed, approach to appreciative inquiry has been used not to identify positive narratives so much as to surface potential dissonance and develop empathy and deeper insight conducive to systemic change. It concludes with a discussion of factors that might help organisations use appreciative inquiry where dissonance is likely to exist and a tentative labelling of this approach as “open appreciative enquiry” with an emphasis on the “e”.

3 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/01447394251360762

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{charles2025,
  title        = {{Appreciating dissonance: Using open appreciative inquiry as a tool to generate cultural change}},
  author       = {Charles Dorr et al.},
  journal      = {Teaching Public Administration},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/01447394251360762},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Appreciating dissonance: Using open appreciative inquiry as a tool to generate cultural change

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.44

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.32 × 0.4 = 0.13
M · momentum0.57 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.