Bridging disclosure and action: The role of intermediaries in gender pay gap regulation

Sue Curtis et al.

Journal of Industrial Relations2025https://doi.org/10.1177/00221856251337198article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.37

Abstract

The gender pay gap (GPG) has come to symbolise persistent inequalities women face at work. In response, governments are increasingly adopting regulation that requires employers to disclose gendered differences in pay, although often without compelling employers to address these pay gaps. An important question therefore arises over the role and capacity of non-state actors operating as regulatory intermediaries to hold employers accountable for closing GPGs. We use Australia as a case study, where a recent government-led review of the Workplace Gender Equality Act 2012 provides insight into intermediaries’ perspectives on GPG disclosure regulation. Drawing on 121 submissions to this legislative review as well as 14 in-depth qualitative interviews, we provide novel insights to identify the cast of regulatory intermediaries, their means of influence and, importantly, the legislative features that enable them to influence employer action to close the GPG.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00221856251337198

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{sue2025,
  title        = {{Bridging disclosure and action: The role of intermediaries in gender pay gap regulation}},
  author       = {Sue Curtis et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Industrial Relations},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00221856251337198},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Bridging disclosure and action: The role of intermediaries in gender pay gap regulation

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.