arbiter
JournalsAccount

When our leaders harm outgroups: How leader prototypicality and situational ambiguity shape outgroup solidarity and leader punishment

Hakan Çakmak et al.

Group Processes and Intergroup Relations2026https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302261426316article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

When prototypical leaders commit organizational transgressions, highly-identified members of the organizations are motivated to punish their leaders, due to increased group-based image concerns. However, do similar dynamics apply when high-status ingroup leaders transgress against vulnerable low-status outgroups? Moreover, does this lead to outgroup solidarity? To address these gaps, we conducted three pre-registered experiments with European, Australian, and British samples, respectively ( N total = 1,039). The first two studies, in which we manipulated leader prototypicality, focused on EU and Australian leader transgressions regarding the treatment of refugees. Moderated mediation analyses showed that, when their leader was prototypical, high-identifiers exhibited greater outgroup solidarity, indirectly through increased group-based image concerns. The third study, conducted in the UK, examined prototypical leader transgressions regarding minority mental health issues following the 2024 riots. This study manipulated transgression ambiguity and found that high-identifiers’ image-based outgroup solidarity was more pronounced when the transgression case was clear-cut rather than ambiguous. Across all studies, low-identifiers expressed outgroup solidarity through perceptions of injustice about the treatment of outgroups, regardless of leader prototypicality and transgression ambiguity. These findings integrate the transgressive leadership literature with solidarity-based collective action research by highlighting leader prototypicality as a key factor in eliciting outgroup solidarity through image concerns among individuals highly invested in high-status transgressor groups, especially when transgressions are clear-cut. Implications are discussed.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302261426316

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{hakan2026,
  title        = {{When our leaders harm outgroups: How leader prototypicality and situational ambiguity shape outgroup solidarity and leader punishment}},
  author       = {Hakan Çakmak et al.},
  journal      = {Group Processes and Intergroup Relations},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302261426316},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

When our leaders harm outgroups: How leader prototypicality and situational ambiguity shape outgroup solidarity and leader punishment

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.