Exploring Preferences for Australian Identity and Implications for Inclusion: A Q Methodology Study
Jack Farrugia & Jonathan Bullen
What the paper says
Australian identity continues to evolve, and remains highly contested, reflecting the socio-cultural and historical tensions of the nation. Understanding which characteristics individuals prefer to define Australian identity is crucial for shaping inclusive national identity constructions and fostering social cohesion. Using Q methodology, this study aimed to examine preferred characteristics of Australian identity by identifying and interpreting shared archetypal viewpoints, highlighting broad commonalities and divergences in how Australian identity is constructed. Forty-six participants ranked a set of statements about Australian identity from most to least preferred. Analysis revealed three distinct viewpoints, reflecting preferences for: (a) prioritising the inclusion of Indigenous Australians and their cultures alongside broader cultural diversity; (b) inclusive civic values reflective of diversity and equity; and (c) social contribution and conditional inclusion. These viewpoints reveal novel constructions of Australian identity, highlighting the need to promote Australian identity in ways that reflect contemporary preferences for inclusion and social cohesion.
Evidence weight
Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
| F · citation impact | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
| M · momentum | 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 |
| V · venue signal | 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 |
| R · text relevance † | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.