Cultivating a Space for Learning: A Study of Note-Taking and Sharing on a Video-Sharing Platform Bilibili

Fangyu Yu et al.

Computer Supported Cooperative Work2025https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-025-09511-7article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.41

Abstract

Video-sharing platforms such as YouTube are popular today, not only for entertainment but also for learning, e.g., for understanding lecture content or acquiring everyday skills. Some platforms, like Bilibili, a popular video-sharing platform in China, even introduced note-taking and sharing features to further foster such learning practices. While note-taking and sharing have been extensively explored in environments specifically for learning, their use around these social media platforms such as YouTube and Bilibili remains under-studied. In this paper, we present a qualitative study with 15 participants who have used the note-taking and sharing feature called BNote launched on Bilibili. Our study reveals how note-taking and sharing are used as a way to cultivate a space for learning on such a general video-sharing platform by structuring, supplementing, and substituting user-generated videos and by leveraging social forces for motivation, self-discipline, and organization for learning. We end by discussing our findings and providing design recommendations to better support a learning space on social media platforms.

2 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-025-09511-7

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{fangyu2025,
  title        = {{Cultivating a Space for Learning: A Study of Note-Taking and Sharing on a Video-Sharing Platform Bilibili}},
  author       = {Fangyu Yu et al.},
  journal      = {Computer Supported Cooperative Work},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-025-09511-7},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Cultivating a Space for Learning: A Study of Note-Taking and Sharing on a Video-Sharing Platform Bilibili

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.