When Diversity Backfires: The Asymmetric Role of Multicultural Diversity on Brand Perception

Esther Uduehi et al.

Journal of Consumer Research2025https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucae068article
FT50UTD24AJG 4*ABDC A*
Weight
0.46

Abstract

Brands are expanding their market to new consumers by displaying cultural diversity in marketing campaigns—but the risks are unclear. This article explores the role of the brand’s characteristics in multicultural diversity. Our findings suggest that when brands launch a new multicultural diversity campaign, it may be well-received if the brand’s original focus was on the needs of nonmarginalized consumers. However, for brands with a focus on the needs of marginalized consumers (i.e., marginalized-focused brands), such a campaign may be perceived as selling out, thereby negatively impacting consumers’ reactions. Six studies with Black and White U.S. consumers explore this novel “sellout effect” across various product categories and for consequential behaviors. Inclusion is identified as a key mechanism, mitigation strategies are explored, and implications for theory and practice are discussed. Findings highlight the importance of diversity marketing, understanding marginalization for consumers and brands, and the need for research that considers race and ethnicity.

4 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucae068

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{esther2025,
  title        = {{When Diversity Backfires: The Asymmetric Role of Multicultural Diversity on Brand Perception}},
  author       = {Esther Uduehi et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Consumer Research},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucae068},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

When Diversity Backfires: The Asymmetric Role of Multicultural Diversity on Brand Perception

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.46

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.37 × 0.4 = 0.15
M · momentum0.57 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.