A structure for evaluating the potential of blockchain use cases in finance

Thomas Ankenbrand & Denis Bieri

Perspectives of Innovations, Economics & Business2017https://doi.org/10.15208/pieb.2017.07article
ABDC C
Weight
0.34

What the paper says

This paper examines the impact of global financial crisis on the Malaysian Islamic stock market integration with the world. We use the International Capital Asset Pricing Model (ICAPM) and moving average to derive the integration index. The results show that the degree of market integration is time-varying. We found evidence that during the crisis, the Malaysian Islamic stock market was obviously segmented from the world market. Therefore the Malaysian Islamic stock market provides opportunity for the potential benefits from international portfolio diversification during the crisis. The prohibition of riba (interest), maysir (gambling) and gharar (uncertainties) along with Islamic values of justice, fairness and avoidance of exploitation are some of possible reason to avoid the Islamic stock market from the financial crisis.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15208/pieb.2017.07

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{thomas2017,
  title        = {{A structure for evaluating the potential of blockchain use cases in finance}},
  author       = {Thomas Ankenbrand & Denis Bieri},
  journal      = {Perspectives of Innovations, Economics & Business},
  year         = {2017},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15208/pieb.2017.07},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

A structure for evaluating the potential of blockchain use cases in finance

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.34

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.