Corporate Responsibility and Deep Seabed Mining: The Limits of Due Diligence

Chiara Macchi

Business and Human Rights Journal2025https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2024.27article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.44

Abstract

The International Seabed Authority is under pressure from some states and companies to adopt the regulations that would allow deep seabed mining (DSM) to commence. While presented by its supporters as necessary to procure the minerals and metals needed for energy transition, DSM presents serious risks for the marine environments and human rights whose extent is still insufficiently understood. This article focuses on whether, should DSM be allowed in the short term, the current regulatory regime would suffice to ensure that the corporations leading this activity carry out effective assessment, prevention and mitigation of environmental impacts. In order to answer this question, it explores contractor obligations as they emerge from the current version of the ‘Mining Code’. In light of persisting scientific uncertainty and the high-risk profile of DSM activities, this article contends that the current version of the regulations does not devise sufficiently stringent due diligence obligations.

3 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2024.27

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{chiara2025,
  title        = {{Corporate Responsibility and Deep Seabed Mining: The Limits of Due Diligence}},
  author       = {Chiara Macchi},
  journal      = {Business and Human Rights Journal},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2024.27},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Corporate Responsibility and Deep Seabed Mining: The Limits of Due Diligence

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.44

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.32 × 0.4 = 0.13
M · momentum0.57 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.