arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Mythes, vooroordelen en feiten: Themanummer ‘Leeftijd op het werk’ (deel 1)

Tinka van Vuuren et al.

Gedrag en Organisatie2026https://doi.org/10.5117/go2026.1.002.vuurarticle
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Myths, prejudices, and facts: Thematic issue ‘Age at work’ (part 1) This is the editorial for the first part of the special issue ‘Age at work’. Four articles are featured in this first part. The first two articles address the differences in work performance across age groups, the myths surrounding this, and the facts. The third article in this issue focuses on the actual differences in mental health within one age group: younger workers. The first two articles of this special issue also discuss how to combat prejudices and stereotypes about older workers. The fourth article focuses on the causes of sustainable employability and interventions to enhance sustainable employability. Older workers who are sustainably employable demonstrate that the prejudices against older workers are unfounded. Together, the articles in this special issue show that the aging workforce compels us to reconsider our perspectives on age, employability, and careers.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5117/go2026.1.002.vuur

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{tinka2026,
  title        = {{Mythes, vooroordelen en feiten: Themanummer ‘Leeftijd op het werk’ (deel 1)}},
  author       = {Tinka van Vuuren et al.},
  journal      = {Gedrag en Organisatie},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5117/go2026.1.002.vuur},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Mythes, vooroordelen en feiten: Themanummer ‘Leeftijd op het werk’ (deel 1)

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.