Watching Radical Geography: Spaces and Practices of Authoritarian Surveillance in ‘Democratic’ and ‘Dictatorial’ Brazil

Federico Ferretti & Guilherme Ribeiro

Antipode2026https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.70131article
AJG 3
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

This paper addresses stories of surveillance of Brazilian critical/radical geographers, drawing on innovative sources. That is, the folders and reports through which the political police and related institutions watched critical and radical scholars during the 20th century in all Brazilian states and abroad, under both ‘dictatorial’ and ‘democratic’ regimes. Our argument is twofold: first, surveillance is not only a device that characterises ‘authoritarian’ or ‘autocratic’ regimes, but a dispositive that can be geared at any moment to the repression of dissidences, even in what is called a ‘democracy’, being not only ‘technology’, but intention to construct a political enemy. Second, ideas on radicalising archives and rescuing alternative geographical traditions should take advantage of hostile sources produced by ‘adversaries’ such as police informants, radicalising these sources through critical readings. To this end, direct access to original documents, places and languages proves paramount to put transnational radical geographies in mutual dialogues.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.70131

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{federico2026,
  title        = {{Watching Radical Geography: Spaces and Practices of Authoritarian Surveillance in ‘Democratic’ and ‘Dictatorial’ Brazil}},
  author       = {Federico Ferretti & Guilherme Ribeiro},
  journal      = {Antipode},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.70131},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Watching Radical Geography: Spaces and Practices of Authoritarian Surveillance in ‘Democratic’ and ‘Dictatorial’ Brazil

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.