arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Awkward Positioning of International Student: Concept Clarification for Developing International Student Talent

Marina Latukha et al.

Human Resource Development Review2025https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843251382834article
ABDC B
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

This paper unpacks the dominant concepts of international students, a demographic of increasing significance within the global talent pool. This study explore how past research identifies international students to reveal the contradictory nature of terminology that could serve as a barrier for talent identification and development within organizational settings. We propose the definition and introduce five criteria for discussing who international students are from the talent development lens. We also suggest avenues for future research. Clarifying the concept of international students is crucial for identifying and understanding their nature and characteristics, which in turn facilitates their development into valuable talent.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843251382834

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{marina2025,
  title        = {{Awkward Positioning of International Student: Concept Clarification for Developing International Student Talent}},
  author       = {Marina Latukha et al.},
  journal      = {Human Resource Development Review},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843251382834},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Awkward Positioning of International Student: Concept Clarification for Developing International Student Talent

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.