arbiter
JournalsAccount

Judging the blame game: how do citizens react to blame shifting in public service delivery?

Oscar Nowlan

Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory2026https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaf038article
AJG 4ABDC A
Weight
0.37

Abstract

This article examines blame shifting, where elected officials attempt to deflect blame for negative outcomes onto other actors. While prior research suggests that citizens generally disapprove of this tactic, this study re-evaluates how contextual factors shape these reactions, focusing specifically on cases of public service failure. In many areas of public management, service delivery is delegated or contracted out to public or private organizations, raising the question of whether such institutional arrangements make it easier for politicians to shift blame onto these agents. A survey experiment (n = 955) was conducted in the United Kingdom involving a hypothetical public service failure. Information cues varied the response strategy of local elected officials (shifting blame or accepting responsibility) and the service delivery model (public or private sector; high or low delegation). The results from OLS regression analyses show that participants were generally less approving of blame shifting compared to accepting responsibility. However, approval increased when the organization being blamed was viewed by participants as carrying more blame for failures in service delivery than the official. Although delegation levels did not directly moderate the effect of blame shifting, further logistic regression analysis shows that higher delegation made participants more likely to view the service provider as culpable, which in turn influenced how they reacted to blame shifting tactics. These findings highlight the conditional nature of public reactions to blame avoidance behavior, showing that citizens’ evaluations of tactics like blame shifting depend on their beliefs about who is responsible, which can be shaped by institutional context. The study offers new insights into when blame shifting may appear more credible or justified and underscores the role of context in shaping the effectiveness of political blame avoidance strategies.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaf038

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{oscar2026,
  title        = {{Judging the blame game: how do citizens react to blame shifting in public service delivery?}},
  author       = {Oscar Nowlan},
  journal      = {Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaf038},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Judging the blame game: how do citizens react to blame shifting in public service delivery?

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.