Modelling Government Processes and Policies in Agriculture: A Review

R.W.M. Johnson & Johnson, R.W.M.

Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics1995https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.12380review
ABDC C
Weight
0.26

What the paper says

In this paper, political preference functions and bargaining models based on game theory are examined for their relevance to government processes and policies in agriculture. While bargaining models show some refinements over preference models in explaining how interest group demands are met in a modern society, the results appear to still fall short of a well-documented understanding of the political economy and institutions involved in policy decisions. In practical terms, economic modelling is too time-consuming and elaborate to inform everyday decisions of government but an understanding of the principles involved and previous results of this kind of analysis can inform the work of both policy advisors and decision makers.

9 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.12380

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{r.w.m.1995,
  title        = {{Modelling Government Processes and Policies in Agriculture: A Review}},
  author       = {R.W.M. Johnson & Johnson, R.W.M.},
  journal      = {Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics},
  year         = {1995},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.12380},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Modelling Government Processes and Policies in Agriculture: A Review

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.26

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.20 × 0.15 = 0.03
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.