Time-Horizon and Timescale Effects in the Quasi-Hyperbolic Discounting Model

Daniel Acland

Review of Behavioral Economics2025https://doi.org/10.1561/105.00000211article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Estimates of the parameters of the quasi-hyperbolic discounting model have been used for quantitative purposes in a range of contexts. I show these estimates are sensitive to time horizon (largest value of t in the data) and timescale (months, years, etc.), and argue that when the quantitative value of the parameters matters, estimates should be used only with great caution, if at all. Using online survey data, I show that β is decreasing in both time horizon and timescale, and vice versa for δ. The time-horizon effect is clearly at least partly the result of estimating a discontinuous discounting model using data that are generated by a continuous discounting process. The time-scale effect appears to be caused by a genuine difference across scales in how individuals discount. I discuss implications for positive and normative analysis as well as possible approaches to proceeding with quantitative analysis in the face of these challenges.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1561/105.00000211

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{daniel2025,
  title        = {{Time-Horizon and Timescale Effects in the Quasi-Hyperbolic Discounting Model}},
  author       = {Daniel Acland},
  journal      = {Review of Behavioral Economics},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1561/105.00000211},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Time-Horizon and Timescale Effects in the Quasi-Hyperbolic Discounting Model

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.