arbiter
JournalsAccount

Interpreting Architectural Drawings: The Role of Gaze and Gestures in Cognitive Offloading

Yesol Park et al.

Applied Cognitive Psychology2026https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.70127article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Interpreting architectural drawings requires integrating explicit visual information with inferred spatial relationships, allowing the study of how internal cognitive processes interdepend on external representations. This study examines how gaze behavior and gestures function as cognitive offloading strategies in spatial interpretation tasks. Architecture students analyzed abstract and detailed floor plans of two buildings while interpreting the spatial function of rooms and user movement. Eye‐tracking revealed that abstract drawings elicited more exploratory gaze patterns, while detailed drawings promoted focal attention and longer visual processing. Gesturing was more frequent in abstract drawings and motion tasks, supporting mental simulation of missing information, whereas deictic gestures dominated in the function interpretation of the detailed drawings, reinforcing explicit visual information. These findings suggest that gaze and gestures are jointly used to offload difficult mental transformations. More broadly, this work highlights how external cognition strategies adapt to task demands and representational affordances in spatial reasoning.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.70127

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{yesol2026,
  title        = {{Interpreting Architectural Drawings: The Role of Gaze and Gestures in Cognitive Offloading}},
  author       = {Yesol Park et al.},
  journal      = {Applied Cognitive Psychology},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.70127},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Interpreting Architectural Drawings: The Role of Gaze and Gestures in Cognitive Offloading

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.