Career Wisdom in Fostering Job Performance: The Mediating Role of Living a Calling

Hui Xu

Journal of Career Assessment2026https://doi.org/10.1177/10690727261425227article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

While research has supported the role of career wisdom in fostering well-being and adjustment, it is important to expand the understanding of the role and mechanisms through which career wisdom facilitates career development. Using a sample of U.S. employed adults ( n = 995), the current study employed a three-wave design to examine the time-lagged predictions of career wisdom for subsequent job performance—including task and contextual performance, as well as counterproductive work behaviors—through living a calling. The results demonstrated that living a calling (Time 2) mediated the positive predictions of career wisdom (Time 1) for subsequent task and contextual performance (Time 3). However, living a calling did not mediate the negative predictions of career wisdom for subsequent counterproductive work behavior (Time 3); instead, career wisdom directly predicted counterproductive work behavior. This study extends the evidence base for the utility of career wisdom and the dual-process theory of career decision making, highlighting career wisdom as an important resource for managing ambiguous career challenges exemplified by living a calling. Implications, future research directions, and limitations are discussed.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10690727261425227

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{hui2026,
  title        = {{Career Wisdom in Fostering Job Performance: The Mediating Role of Living a Calling}},
  author       = {Hui Xu},
  journal      = {Journal of Career Assessment},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10690727261425227},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Career Wisdom in Fostering Job Performance: The Mediating Role of Living a Calling

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.