The link between perceived group need support and thwarting and personal wellness: The moderating role of identity centrality.

Joachim Waterschoot et al.

Group Dynamics: theory, research and practice2025https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000242article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Objective: With a growing emphasis on making societies more inclusive, the present study examines how people's perceptions of whether their society provides basic psychological need support or thwarting to their group relate to group members' well-being and ill-being depending on the extent to which group membership is central to their identity. Method: Participants were Australians (N = 1,994, M-age = 42.15, 51% female) and Americans (N = 1,693, M-age = 41.48, 79.1% female) who self-described as members of either an ethnic, religious, political, or sexual orientation group. Results: In both studies, perceived group need support (vs. thwarting) statistically significantly influenced individual well-being (vs. ill-being) through basic psychological need satisfaction (vs. frustration), an effect that was magnified for sexuality-oriented and political groups in Study 2 when group identity was more central to self-concept. Conclusions: These results highlight how societal conditions at the group level influence the fulfillment of personal basic psychological needs, illustrating the importance of group identification for individual well-being.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000242

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{joachim2025,
  title        = {{The link between perceived group need support and thwarting and personal wellness: The moderating role of identity centrality.}},
  author       = {Joachim Waterschoot et al.},
  journal      = {Group Dynamics: theory, research and practice},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000242},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The link between perceived group need support and thwarting and personal wellness: The moderating role of identity centrality.

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.