Digital Well-Being and Superdigital Citizenship: A Class Comparison of Parenting Practices for Remote Learning

Lauren Erdreich

Social Justice Research2025https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-025-00454-4article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Abstract Using the pandemic as a natural laboratory for exploring edtech, this study is concerned with the changes in parental involvement that the demands of remote-learning elicited and implications for educational justice across classes. Interviews with 25 middle-class and low-income parents revealed classed practices of parental involvement in remote-learning: middle-class parents espouse a digital well-being approach while low-income parents espouse a superdigital citizenship approach. The former is concerned with maintaining what parents see as a healthy balance between children’s digital activity and school learning; the latter with ensuring children have access to what parents see as varied resources and opportunities for learning and social connection available online and in face-to-face daily interaction, particularly in school. Classed practices of parental involvement reveal that parental involvement is a salient sphere of educational justice particularly in the context of educational technology implementation, and are implicated in issues of cultural and distributive justice.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-025-00454-4

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{lauren2025,
  title        = {{Digital Well-Being and Superdigital Citizenship: A Class Comparison of Parenting Practices for Remote Learning}},
  author       = {Lauren Erdreich},
  journal      = {Social Justice Research},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-025-00454-4},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Digital Well-Being and Superdigital Citizenship: A Class Comparison of Parenting Practices for Remote Learning

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.