MO-SMAC: Multiobjective Sequential Model-Based Algorithm Configuration

Jeroen Rook et al.

Evolutionary Computation2025https://doi.org/10.1162/evco_a_00371article
AJG 3
Weight
0.44

What the paper says

Automated algorithm configuration aims at finding well-performing parameter configurations for a given problem, and it has proven to be effective within many AI domains, including evolutionary computation. Initially, the focus was on excelling in one performance objective, but, in reality, most tasks have a variety of (conflicting) objectives. The surging demand for trustworthy and resource-efficient AI systems makes this multiobjective perspective even more prevalent. We propose a new general-purpose multiobjective automated algorithm configurator by extending the widely-used SMAC framework. Instead of finding a single configuration, we search for a nondominated set that approximates the actual Pareto set. We propose a pure multiobjective Bayesian optimization approach for obtaining promising configurations by using the predicted hypervolume improvement as acquisition function. We also present a novel intensification procedure to efficiently handle the selection of configurations in a multiobjective context. Our approach is empirically validated and compared across various configuration scenarios in four AI domains, demonstrating superiority over baseline methods, competitiveness with MO-ParamILS on individual scenarios, and an overall best performance.

3 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/evco_a_00371

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jeroen2025,
  title        = {{MO-SMAC: Multiobjective Sequential Model-Based Algorithm Configuration}},
  author       = {Jeroen Rook et al.},
  journal      = {Evolutionary Computation},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/evco_a_00371},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

MO-SMAC: Multiobjective Sequential Model-Based Algorithm Configuration

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.44

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.32 × 0.4 = 0.13
M · momentum0.57 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.