Who Your Friends are Matters: Types of Supporters and Child Recruitment by Rebel Groups

Yun Jung Yang

Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy2025https://doi.org/10.1515/peps-2024-0062article
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Abstract Child soldiering has been identified as one of the most prevalent human rights violations perpetrated by rebels. The aim of this research is to elucidate the potential influence of third parties, external supporters, on child soldiering by rebels. The research hypothesises that rebel’s likelihood of child recruitment could be differentiated depending on who the supporter is. The research argues that rebels with the backing of other insurgent groups are more likely to engage in child recruitment, whereas they may not engage in active child soldiering when having state supporters. The statistical results support the argument that rebels with rebel supporters are more likely to recruit child soldiers; however, the research also finds inconsistent outcomes on the impact of state supporters. This research emphasises the heterogeneity amongst types of supporters and contributes to the understanding of the relationships between external supporters and child recruitment, which has been relatively understudied.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/peps-2024-0062

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{yun2025,
  title        = {{Who Your Friends are Matters: Types of Supporters and Child Recruitment by Rebel Groups}},
  author       = {Yun Jung Yang},
  journal      = {Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/peps-2024-0062},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Who Your Friends are Matters: Types of Supporters and Child Recruitment by Rebel Groups

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.