On the Optimal Selection of Mel‐Frequency Cepstral Coefficients for Voice Deepfake Detection

Sergio A. Falcón‐López et al.

Expert Systems2026https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.70245article
AJG 2
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

The continuous evolution of techniques for generating manipulated audio, known as voice deepfakes, and the widespread availability of tools that produce convincing forgeries have created an urgent need for reliable detection methods. This work considers the dimensionality of Mel‐Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCCs) as a core design variable for practical, deployable systems. The aim is to identify the smallest number of coefficients that preserve detection performance across heterogeneous models while reducing computational cost, a critical factor for mobile and edge deployment. This study evaluates a hybrid setting on the ASVspoof 2019 Logical Access dataset, in which the same feature family serves as input to five traditional machine learning algorithms (Random Forest, k‐Nearest Neighbours, Linear Support Vector Classification, Extreme Gradient Boosting and Support Vector Machine with radial basis function kernel) and five deep learning models (Convolutional Neural Network, Recurrent Neural Network, Convolutional Recurrent Neural Network, Xception and ResNet). Results indicate that deep models reach near‐peak performance with a small number of coefficients, whereas classical methods require a larger number to achieve stable performance (except Linear Support Vector Classification, which consistently underperforms). Accordingly, 32 coefficients are considered an effective operating point for hybrid deployments. Overall, the results provide evidence to guide the selection of the number of MFCC coefficients in voice deepfake detection, aiming for efficient, reproducible and explainable systems.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.70245

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{sergio2026,
  title        = {{On the Optimal Selection of Mel‐Frequency Cepstral Coefficients for Voice Deepfake Detection}},
  author       = {Sergio A. Falcón‐López et al.},
  journal      = {Expert Systems},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.70245},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

On the Optimal Selection of Mel‐Frequency Cepstral Coefficients for Voice Deepfake Detection

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.