Kahulugan ng Kabuhayan: conceptualising a practice-based meaning of informal tourism work

Kyrie Eleison Muñoz et al.

Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management2026https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2026.101419article
AJG 2ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Research has shifted attention toward the subjective meanings workers attach to their labour. While valuable, extant literature has centred on individual and subjective meanings of work, often overlooking the broader sociocultural dimensions that shape these meanings. Using a six-month cross-indigenous ethnographic approach and Filipino practice-based methods, we hence examine the social-relational practices of 52 informal tourism workers in Palawan, Philippines, to explore how they derive meaning from their work. Findings reveal that workers associate their labour with meanings of collective identity, struggle, and strength expressed through normative, dialogic, and embodied practices grounded in the native virtue of pakikipagkapwa (shared inner self). These collective meanings challenge individualistic understandings of work and underscore the significance of culturally embedded social practices in tourism labour. We propose an empirically-informed framework grounded on the sociocultural practices that shape meaningful work and policy-relevant insights into the social value of informal labour in tourism.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2026.101419

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{kyrie2026,
  title        = {{Kahulugan ng Kabuhayan: conceptualising a practice-based meaning of informal tourism work}},
  author       = {Kyrie Eleison Muñoz et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2026.101419},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Kahulugan ng Kabuhayan: conceptualising a practice-based meaning of informal tourism work

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.