arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Author-paid publication fees corrupt science and should be abandoned

Thomas J. H. Morgan & Paul E. Smaldino

Science and Public Policy2025https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaf026article
AJG 2ABDC C
Weight
0.44

What the paper says

Abstract Author-paid publication fees, often associated with so-called “gold” open access journals, lead to the corruption of science by incentivizing the publication of low-quality research and exacerbate inequalities between institutions that are prestigious and well-funded and those that are less so. Pressures to pay article processing fees on the part of funding agencies and university libraries waste research funding and stymie efforts to establish more sustainable publishing systems. We recommend a total abandonment of author-paid publication fees for academic research, the publication of which is typically a public good yet serves to enrich publishers while degrading research outputs. Alternative approaches related to “green” and “diamond” open access are cautiously recommended, as is a refocusing on society-run journals. We encourage the search for alternative models for evaluating and publicizing scientific research, including the formal modelling of competing approaches.

3 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaf026

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{thomas2025,
  title        = {{Author-paid publication fees corrupt science and should be abandoned}},
  author       = {Thomas J. H. Morgan & Paul E. Smaldino},
  journal      = {Science and Public Policy},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaf026},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Author-paid publication fees corrupt science and should be abandoned

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.44

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.32 × 0.4 = 0.13
M · momentum0.57 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.