Estimation of conditional treatment effect and prediction of binary outcomes using the joint use of propensity and prognostic scores

Jonggyu Baek et al.

Journal of Applied Statistics2026https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2026.2629844article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Marginal treatment effect (MTE), including the average treatment effect on treated (ATT) and the average treatment effect (ATE), informs policymakers of a treatment's effect at the population level. Relative to MTE, conditional treatment effect (CTE) and patient outcome prediction are more informative at the individual level. In clinical settings with shared decision-making, patients and clinicians alike may want to know the effect of a treatment and its resulting health outcome in the context of the patient's specific health status and comorbidities. To estimate CTE on the individual level, we have proposed a method that employs a generalized additive model (GAM) with a tensor smoother of estimated propensity and prognostic scores. Using this method to control for confounders and to utilize patient's conditions, we posit that outcome prediction in the setting of observational studies will be improved. In order to apply this proposed method to practice, we examined the association between 30-day statin discontinuation and 1- and 2-year mortality among newly admitted nursing home residents in the US, 2011–2016.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2026.2629844

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jonggyu2026,
  title        = {{Estimation of conditional treatment effect and prediction of binary outcomes using the joint use of propensity and prognostic scores}},
  author       = {Jonggyu Baek et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Applied Statistics},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2026.2629844},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Estimation of conditional treatment effect and prediction of binary outcomes using the joint use of propensity and prognostic scores

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.